System
All
Amiga
Atari 2600
Atari ST
C64
Game Boy
NES
PC
Plus/4
SNES
Vectrex
ZX Spectrum

Genre
All
Action
Adventure
Puzzle
RPG
Simulation
Sport
Strategy

Year
All
Pre-1982
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
Post-1996

Letter
All
#
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Rating
All
0
1
2
3
4
5
6

Reviewer
All
Mr Creosote
Tapuak
Jeff
dregenrocks
Johann67
Little Boy
Vohaul
Vemperor
Adhoc
PhotoTropic
Elwood
Gesh
Eff10
Hoffe
NetDanzr
Dizzy the Egg
Dr. Ramesch
Guzzardo
std
Incise-66
J. Durr
ardell
Wandrell
Looger
Pietoro
Smitle
Zork
Cypherswipe
fretz
sandy21
Jumpman Junior

Licence
All
Commercial
Shareware
Freeware

Company

Game Name

Main Page

Systeminfo

Apps

FAQ

Editorials

Crew

Help Us

Links

Forum


Support:

Abandoned Places
The highly unofficial Abandonware Ring
RSS-Feed
Mozilla Search Plugin

eXTReMe Tracker
Z

Bitmap Brothers 1996
Genre: Strategy
Language: English
Licence: Commercial
System: PC

Rating:
?

Tapuak:
6/6
Mr Creosote:
5/6
Overall:
5.5/6


Review it Download Review
Review by Tapuak (published 2001-02-19, last updated 2006-09-15):
Is it just a cheap "Command&Conquer" clone or a game with new ideas? Both is right because 'Z' is obviously a part of the past wave of real-time strategy games but it is also far better than similar games.
The basic game concept should be clear: You control battle units which - unlike to turn-based strategy games - are moved across the battlefield simultaneously by both players. You get a little help by the computer as units are defending themselves when enemies enter their fire range.
The most obvious difference (luckily) between 'Z' and similar games is the not so strict seriousness and the missing of an otherwise regular feature 'mining resources'. There´s also no background story.
In 'Z' your goal in every mission is of course to defeat your opponent which means to conquer his fort or destroy it. The road to success on the other hand is somewhat different: The battlefield is parted into several sectors which are conquered by touching a flag. Control over a sector will mostly also give you possession of a factory which is in that sector and which will let you produce new units whereas the production speed depends on the number of sectors you´re in charge of. And keep in mind that whenever the enemy touches a flag just once the whole sector is back in his hands. So imperialistic expansionism (occupating sectors) and capitalism (control over production facilities) is required to win.
The units system is quite simplified: Basically there are just robots, vehicles and guns, but of course various types of each. Vehicles are getting better straightforward; from the jeep to the mobile rocket launcher their destruction power is ever increasing but they´re getting ever slower. The robots on the other hand have their special abilities (look into the manual for further details). Because of the longer production time of 'better' units the player always has to find a compromise between quality and quantity. The unit-producing factories are sorted by units (vehicle-/robot-factory) and by levels (of production capabilities) which slowly improve during the game and thus make new models available.
The 20 levels are divided into 5 surroundings (planets) with 4 levels each which apart from other graphics only bear minimal differences.
In which way these hard facts affect the fun is to everyone´s liking. For my part the relatively small number of units is - concerning the hectic gameplay - surely advantageous. Basically speed is more important than tactics. Luck is also a major factor in this game.
But you can´t deny that 'Z' is well suited for beginners because you can start instantly without having to work your way into it. Unlike in other games of this genre the player has to deal with some kind of 'artificial intelligence' which tries to react intuitively to different situations and not to fall into certain routines of placing units always the same way. Besides that the graphics and also the interface are very convincing. Saving is possible at any time.
A negative aspect is the lack of options. Instead of just a gamma setup other options would have been desirable. Also the concept of sectors has one downside: It´s almost impossible to turn the tide when one side owns a majority of them for some time because the doubled advantage - more facilities and faster production speed - will make one´s superiority unsurmountable.
All in all a puristic game without unnecessary gimmicks - very well made indeed!



Your options: Add CommentReview itTechnical Help

This page has been viewed 45879 times.

««« Back to Listing