Ahhh, back to political debating

Seeing as we all seem to be quite anti-Bush around here (to all exceptions, sorry), who do you think would be the best candidate to face Bush?

My vote still goes to Dean, even with his strange roar he seems to be the only semi-winning candidate that doesn't believe the rest of the world is only there to listen to the US (like Kerry).

I haven't followed this show at all to be honest. The only thing I heard from this Kerry guy was something along the lines of "I voluntarily went to Vietnam to fight for my great country, coward Bush didn't", and Bush's reaction "But you said that the Vietnam war wasn't all great when you got back". I'm still trying to figure out which of these 'arguments' is supposed to be positive and which negative.

Kerry has a half a billion dollars
Bush has a half a billion dollars

Whoever slugs out the most money wins.

And that's political reasoning in your country?

Yes.

Figures. I guess if there are no actual political differences, this void has to be filled with something...

Well, their political differences depend on which global corporation is contributing to their capaign fund.

So whom will you be voting for, Björk?

Let's see. Dean is out, and the next day Nader anounced his candidacy; waiting whether Dean would stay in the race or not. It's now Kerry or Edwards, and I guess Kerry will win the nomination. Whether he becomes a president or not, nothing's really gonna change; he's got a record of playing both sides, to appease the most people. However, if he gets elected, there won't be a single Republican left on the list of the five richest presidents (inflation adjusted), and some right-wingers, such as Rush Limbaugh, already take great pleasure mentioning this detail. (For the record, the currently there are two Federalists - Washington and Adams, two Democrats - Kennedy and Johnson, and a Republican on the fifth place - Hoover). Not that I care; it's only a small trivia

And it's not that 'Federalists' are any different from 'Republicans'