Kein Problem, vielen Dank für deine Sicht!

Short summary: having multiple similar games listed is more important than the guidance provided by pros and cons. Reviewers should be better supported by receiving automatic suggestions which could then be accepted with a mouse click.

So, considerng that there are no realistic alternatives as far as I can see, this is what we'll go with:

• Similar games will just be titles by default.
• If a game is not on the site, it should have a short textual description (one sentence), which will disappear once the pointer can be resolved. (Example)
• Old pros and cons already written will be archived, i.e. also not displayed in their old place anymore.
• Automatic suggestions will be displayed on the form to enter similarity entries as guidance, but with a warning that "blind" picking may not work out.

I still need to program the last part. So give me some time.

Starting now, submissions will be accepted with similarity picks without pros and cons.

For the "how", I would like to keep the titles inside the boxes, as I really like the effect. Any additional considerations?

Good idea. I noticed the games which are present still have descriptions stored in the database. Would there be any further use for those? Just wondering.



Suggestion: how about making 3 vertical rows of pads instead of just 2? I think it would look much better taking all the empty horizontal space and also sparing the vertical one somewhat.

Agreed, it should just flow and use whatever space is available.

It struck me just now that descriptions for existing game entries should not be completely replaced with screenshots but rather pop up on mouseover. I mean, why keep old descriptions if you can't even see them? We should rather make good use of them. However, if we are to implement this then descriptions will become mandatory regardless, which i would personally support. What do you think?

Having entered a couple of hundred such links in the last weeks, I don't want to amend all those now.